Search This Blog

Friday, September 13, 2013

Forget Smart Cars, Imagine an Intelligent Highway

As reported by Fox BusinessAs automakers look into developing a new generation of tech-savvy cars that can drive themselves, others are tackling a seemingly more impossible feat: giving the concrete roads they drive on brains of their own.  

Smart Highways – the brainchild of Dutch designer Daan Roosegaarde – would be able to charge electric cars passing over them, paint temporary digital snowflakes over ice patches, illuminate priority lanes and reduce energy waste by using streetlights donned with sensors.

It may sound fantastical, but this is not just some artist’s dream. It’s reality.

Bringing his idea to fruition, Roosegaarde, who has called himself in jest a "hippie with a business plan," has teamed up with an unlikely partner: publicly-traded multinational Heijman, one of Europe’s largest engineers and road manufactures.

The earliest versions of their jointly-developed Smart Highway will appear later this year on a 150-meter stretch of road in the Netherlands province of Brabant. Roosegaarde predicts highways across the world can be transitioned within the next three to five years.

The idea last month won the INDEX: Award 2013 – a highly prestigious prize for “Designs to Improve Life” administered only once every two years. The prize comes with a 100,000-euro reward, which Roosegaarde will inject into the project’s continued development.

“These are all ideas which are not super high-tech, they are basic principles which we can implement to existing roads,” Roosegaarde said in a video posted to CNN, which highlights Index nominations.

Beautiful and Smart
The Index jurors said they were impressed with Smart Highway because it provides an entirely new approach to traditional roads that is “not only beautiful and alluring but also sustainable and cost-effective.”

Using a series of solar technologies, dynamic paint and smart sensors, the road would be designed to come alive at night. Lanes would illuminate, electric cars would be charged, glow-in-the-dark paint would highlight dangerous conditions or traffic patterns and street lights would light up only as a car approached.

"Why can we not connect it to a small, simple sensor so the lights are only on when you drive so you get this beautiful sort-of ghost of light?" Roosegaarde asks.

The Super Highway is designed to be simultaneously beautiful and intelligent, armed with capabilities to spark future innovation around the way people drive and live. 

While vehicles themselves continue to be a major piece of this puzzle as manufacturers like Elon Musk’s Tesla (TSLA) build electric cars and others focus on autonomous ones, roads have barely budged. 

“When we look at highways, why is so much money and time and energy spent on cars but the actual roads themselves are still stuck in the Middle Ages?” Roosegaarde asks. 

The project has a five-step plan for modernizing European roadways, including embedding highways with technology that can visually communicate with the driver using "smart" paint that would be charged by the sun throughout the day. 
Paving existing roads with new technologies could help make electric cars -- even autonomous cars -- more feasible and desirable, with roads evolving as fast as the technologies that power them.

Wising Up
The basic idea is nothing new – in fact, as early as 1991 a professor at Virginia Tech proposed embedding electronic sensors into the pavement that would be able to relay information about road’s conditions via “radio waves to a central computer.” 

In 2010, the research group ACCESS Linnaeus Centre announced a focus on “wireless sensor networks” for roads, saying it would help reduce the environmental impact of the transportation system and improve efficiency.
However, past projects have been hit with high costs and technological roadblocks. 

Dr. Rajit Gadh, director of the UCLA Smart Grid Energy Research Center, which is studying how to better plug electric vehicles (EV) into the smart grid, says mass-scale projects cannot be widely successful without acquiring several minor successes first.

While the technology exists to charge EV cars wirelessly while in motion, he warns of the heavy costs of putting inductive coils underground every few feet on the highway and suggests instead using this still infant technology at high-traffic intersections, bus stops or stop signs where energy can be more efficiently transferred. 

If developers prove through smaller feats the feasibility of their technology, they may be able to garner more investment, which could ultimately help trigger fresh commercial investment and adoption. 

"There’s still a lot of steps needed to be done in research labs before you can have a pretty scalable solution whereby you can charge in an economical manner while you're driving," Gadh said. Though he does see it becoming as ubiquitous as today's EV charging stations -- perhaps even gas stations -- much farther down the road.

Developers of the Smart Highway plan to use resonant magnetic fields stationed under the road to charge moving cars. They are tweaking their technology in partnership with the Dutch government.  

Ever the designer, Roosegaarde is already brainstorming new ideas, including applying some of these same technologies to illuminate bicycle lanes or airport landing tracks.

One day, he might even try to use the bioluminescence of jellyfish and fireflies to illuminate roadside shrubbery, an effort to once-and-for-all get rid of light poles. 

DNA Tracker Wins Asia Contract for Wireless Location Monitoring

DNA Tracker has announced a new contract to install it's Target
Proximity Monitoring System
for a South East Asian government.
As reported by Shepard MediaThe new contract includes both static and mobile devices, along with a data analysis and visualization capability. Deployment is scheduled to commence before the end of 2013, and be completed by 2014.

The system will be deployed to protect high value government sites throughout the country.
Speaking to Shephard at the DSEI exhibition, Alexander Giles, associate director for DNA Tracker, said the product was ready to be shipped pending the completion of various compliance assessments.

‘The end customer has signed on with an initial order, which is substantial, which we are very confident will lead to further orders. In addition we are running field trials right now for two NATO countries, and we anticipate that by the end of the year we will have another country signed on as a third order,‘ said Giles. 
‘The technology is ours, patented here in the UK. What we have is the capability to pick up most emitting signals you may be carrying with you, for example your mobile phone, including 2G, 3G, WIFI, and blue tooth. We are currently developing solutions for 4G and CDMA. We are confident we will have a system to demonstrate those capabilities by the end of the year.’
The system tracks and records real-time geo-location data for all targets within a defined area. Threat levels can be allocated to individual targets, and subsets of geo-perimeters defined within the monitored area to trigger alerts when specific criteria are met.
The software date-stamps each device as it arrives, and allows us to define a geo-fence for blacklisted individuals for whom we have a specific interest in limiting access to a given area. The moment they enter that area, an alert is generated,’ said Giles. 
This capability, combined with the devices capacity to track movements over time within a given area, lends itself to security applications where detection of anomalous behaviors is a requirement, for example airports and prisons
‘For example, anyone who enters an airport and lingers for longer than 90 minutes, which is the usual time between check-in and flights, can be flagged up by this device,’ Giles explained.   
The system plugs into an existing phone mast or power supply, and has an effective range of 200 meters. This will extend out to the range of the device the system is coupled to. 
‘There are some environments where you will have a range of up to 1000 meters – for example if you paired the device to a mobile phone mast. So the same restrictions that apply to a mobile phone mast in its ability to be of use to you, exist with this device.’
To deploy remotely, the system requires a battery pack. In very remote areas, the system can be coupled to a SATCOM device.  
According to Giles, the system also has the capability to be integrated into existing security networks.
‘Right now we have a standalone product, which we do not pretend to be the 100% answer to your surveillance requirements, for the simple fact that for obvious reasons it does rely on the fact that your device is on.’

Smartphones Raise Privacy Issue in Healthcare

As reported by Sydney Morning HeraldWe've all heard the urban legend of the patient who turns up in hospital emergency with something inserted where it shouldn't be.

But is the easy availability of camera phones encouraging doctors and nurses to take a souvenir snap of the occasion?

A study of one big Australian hospital has found about half of all doctors and nurses take photos of patients in hospital – and one in five are using their personal smartphone.

Study author and researcher at RMIT University in Melbourne Kara Burns said the easy availability of camera phones was improving patient care and medical training, but raised serious privacy issues.

"Everybody that you talk to that works in healthcare will have an experience of seeing a doctor pulling out a phone, or even being the patient who is being photographed," said Ms Burns, a medical photographer. "Doctors definitely feel that it is part of good practice to document a patient's condition."

Yet nearly 40 per cent of doctors and nurses surveyed did not always obtain consent for their photos. And "non-compliance with written consent requirements ... was endemic", she wrote in the journal Australian Health Review.

She said the photos were overwhelmingly taken for inclusion in a patient's file, or for medical education, but it was clear there was also immense public interest in medical photographs.

A recent story in The Canberra Times documenting a medical report of a 70-year-old man who had a fork stuck in his 'groin area' was shared more than 21,000 times on Facebook.

And the respected New England Journal of Medicine runs a popular "Image Challenge" on its website where viewers can guess what caused often gruesome medical conditions.

Fairfax Media is not suggesting these images violate patient consent or privacy.

Australian Medical Association head Steve Hambleton said it was taking the issue extremely seriously, with three committees now developing guidelines for doctors.

With the integration of medical tools
and smartphones, image capture for
healthcare fields will be an important
topic.
"These new technologies have been really great for helping patients," he said. "For example, if a patient has a fracture, that can be photographed and transferred to [other doctors] and that makes the job of deciding who comes in and what sort of care is required much more simple."

He said if images were used for teaching or medical case reports, doctors went to great lengths to ensure the patient could not be identified. But doctors needed guidance on how best to protect images they took.

"Does it go straight to the patient's medical file, or does it stay on the phone, and does the phone have the right level of security?" he said. "Doctors need to be aware of the magnitude of the risk".

GPS III Satellite Control Software Passes Test

As reported by the Denver Business JournalA new software system for the next generation of global positioning satellites has passed a key test of its launch and early orbit operations, the two Denver-area companies building the system for the U.S. Air Force reported Thursday.


The operations and control software for the GPS III satellites, created and run by Raytheon Co.’s Information and Intelligence Systems (IIS) division in Aurora, recently passed the third of five tests planned ahead of the 2015 launch of the first of the new, GPS III satellites, which Lockheed Martin Space Systems is building in Jefferson County.
Raytheon is creating the ground control and satellite operations software for the GPS III system at its Aurora offices.Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co.(LMSS) built a GPS III production facility at its Waterton Canyon campus that opened in 2011 for the first six GPS III satellites.
The companies combined have secured more than $2 billion worth of contracts for the work.
The Raytheon OCX software met “mission requirements and is on track to support the launch of the first GPS III satellite,” the company said. Two more readiness exercises and a half-dozen launch rehearsals will be conducted before the first GPS III satellite is launched.
The GPS III system is being designed to have a signal far more powerful than today’s GPS, making it more accurate and requiring much more powerful signal-jamming equipment to interfere with it.
In 2012, U.S. Air Force Gen. William Shelton, commander of the U.S. Space Command, expressed concern about Raytheon’s OCX software not being ready for the first launch, which then was expected to take place as early as 2014.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Intellectual Property Considerations when Evaluating a GPS Fleet Tracking System

Intellectual property and prior art are key factors when evaluating
GPS Fleet Tracking system providers.
Written by Thomas L. Grounds: If the adjective 'tried and true' is a notion you're familiar with - then consider how that may apply to your GPS Fleet Tracking system provider.

As a business develops products and services in the marketplace, it develops insight into how their customers operate, and how to most efficiently and reliably approach solutions.  Over time, they can develop a significant amount of intellectual property and 'art' in the market-space; some of which can be patented.  Anything not patented still has standing as 'prior art', or 'trade secrets'.

There has been some discussion in the media lately about intellectual property and patent trolls, which has set off some heated dialogue about the additional costs to businesses licensing patented technology of this sort.  

In the US, patents cannot be filed by corporations, they can only be filed by individuals or groups - though, corporations can acquire patents from these individuals.  Patents were originally awarded so that developers could have time to develop their ideas in the market without being pushed aside by larger forces.  It also gave them the right to license the technology so they could benefit from being an innovator.
'Flash of Genius' is a 2008 American
biographical movie about Robert Kearns and his
legal battle against the Ford Motor Co when
he developed and patented the
 intermittent windshield wiper.

However, not all competitors are willing to wait for the patent to expire, or to acquire a license, especially if the market is large and lucrative.  They may choose to infringe now, and wait out the patent holder - as in the movie "Flash of Genius".

Filing against an 'infringer' in the court system, usually (but not always) a corporation, can be difficult if the individuals holding the patent do not have funding and/or legal staffing to go up against potentially large companies with deep pockets; especially if the patent field is fairly technical, and there are a number of other patents in the same space, or if there is a lot of 'prior art' in the field.

So, in many cases, developers, designers, or engineers who have good ideas, who filed early and have been able to create the requisite models, demos, or systems to support their patent claims - but without the funding to carry them forward against the 'Goliaths' of their industry, feel that they are forced to either settle with the infringers on terms that are not necessarily beneficial to the patent owner; or they must team up with a patent troll for a potentially more favorable outcome.

Patent trolls typically buy up several patents in a particular market space, and then with large amounts of capital go head to head with leaders in a particular market.  They have the staff, and the funds to make sure that the 'Goliaths' can't just crush them in the court system.  Patent trolls may seem like a boon to small entrepreneurs going up against behemoths; but they can sometimes turn their patent portfolios around and use them as leverage against individual patent holders to get a larger portion of the profits.  They're no angels.

Because the purchase of the patent rights is mostly speculative, and the expenses of going up against such large entities varies but can be quite sizable (and risky) - patent trolls end up with the lion's share of the revenue from any licensing agreement.  80% is typical depending on the financial status of the developer, and how narrow or wide the patent coverage is on a particular market and how large their existing portfolio is.  This may or may not be comparatively beneficial to the original patent holder - especially if the idea is worth millions, if not billions in the marketplace.

So when I hear that we need new laws attempting to control 'patent trolls', it sounds to me like large businesses being resentful of the rights of patent holders, and/or poor behavior on the part of the patent trolls that are leveraging to enforce those licenses in court.  

I agree that the patent system - which was originally designed to give individuals a fighting chance against large businesses with deep pockets, is broken.  And while I don't personally believe in working with patent trolls; if carefully managed they can be effective sometimes, especially when the alternative is potential bankruptcy for the individuals going up against big business with no intention of negotiating.

So, how does this reflect back toward the GPS fleet tracking industry?  While portions of the science seem fresh and new to users, the technology has been around for a fairly long time - since the early 90's (or earlier if you consider Loran communications systems providing location over private 800MHz radio); and some of these early systems existed in the 'cloud' at that time; some written in Java to live on the Internet, even before 2001.

So you may want to look for companies that have been in the business for many years (or that have been 'rooted' in the science for more than a few years), with patents on their inventions (licensed or not), and with years and years of 'prior art' which can act as a form of protection - to the company, as well as their clients.
  
Prior art can be helpful in that even if the company doesn't own patents on all of it's techniques (such as geo-fence alerts), if it's use of the technology pre-dates patents in the industry, then it cannot be forced to subject to licensing.  There are several patent trolls looking for geo-fence infringers in the industry - and even though some of the new ad systems utilize geo-fencing in new and interesting ways, they are still using the same basic concept of setting up a fence around an object, and using a GPS tracking device to forward that data and make the comparison - and alerting the customer.

Newer companies in the industry may have a novel or new way of presenting location data, but since the data gathering techniques have been around for a long time, they are likely subject to licensing of these former patent holders - and that generally means, higher services or product pricing for companies that don't have the significant history in the market.

So if you are looking to keep your costs down, look at businesses that have a significant amount of time in the GPS Fleet Tracking industry, as well as patents, prior art and trade secrets that create a solid base of technology from which to build the next generation of GPS tracking innovative products and solutions. 

'Tried and true' is not just important indicator with regard to intellectual property - it's also a key to long term reliability in the market.

Fleet Management and Logistics in Food and Beverage Transportation

As reported by SupplyDemandChain: Many executives of food and beverage distribution and logistics companies are aware of the need for oversight of employees, vehicles and other assets. It has become a necessary task that businesses in the field face on a daily basis. Fleet and asset tracking are becoming more common than ever as executives and fleet managers look to ensure the efficient and effective use of their fleets, assets and employees.

At the basic level, telematics refers to the use of telecommunications and informatics to provide many practical applications for the food and beverage distribution industry. For example, in the supply industry, accurate delivery times are crucial to ensure the rest of the day’s tasks stay on time.

Another term for telematics is global positioning system (GPS) fleet tracking, however, that terminology does not fully encompass what a GPS fleet tracking solution can do for a food and beverage logistics business. These solutions have many more capabilities than simple track-and-trace options, allowing fleet managers to do more than locate vehicles or assets on a map. A comprehensive GPS fleet tracking solution should be an essential business tool for any food and beverage companies with a fleet, no matter how small. Even with the most basic usage, GPS technology allows for increased fuel efficiency and employee productivity, showing a reduction in overall operating expenses.


Companies must be able to track and manage their investments without compromising security or efficiency. GPS fleet technology, paired with an easy-to-implement solution, effectively monitors fleets, ensuring efficient use of the company’s fuel and time. Whether your business has three vehicles or 300, this technology plays a vital role in maximizing revenue, increasing operational efficiencies and achieving a return on investment (ROI).

Vehicle Tracking to Save on Fuel
GPS fleet tracking solutions offer benefits that go beyond simply knowing where vehicles are. The functions of a GPS fleet tracking solution save companies money, even when the features don’t directly target an issue, such as excessive fuel spend. The routing feature of a GPS fleet tracking solution not only ensures your drivers can get to their next delivery, site or warehouse on time, but also ensures that drivers have the most direct route to a location, thus reducing excessive fuel use.

Some GPS fleet tracking solutions integrate with intuitive and popular GPS systems such as Garmin or Magellan. Many companies choose these solutions for their fleets because of the appeal of the consumer-facing GPS systems that they are accustomed to using in their personal lives. However, a GPS fleet tracking solution that integrates with such a GPS system can have more benefits than a minimal learning curve. One supply chain and goods transportation company, SEKO, cut down on surplus driving in its fleet and reduced fuel costs with the voice-guided, turn-by-turn directions. By using the fleet tracking solution’s routing functionality, the company’s fleet manager made his drivers more productive, and cut down on fuel costs, and vehicle wear and tear.

Hard Data to Cut Back on Costs
A look into operations makes it clear what’s working and what’s not.

GPS fleet tracking solutions provide a variety of reports and information on a number of driving factors, including how many times a truck starts and stops, how long it idles, and if any dangerous driving behavior occurs.

These reports are not used to target or scold drivers, but to simply identify driving habits that can be altered to save money for the company.

The reporting capability provides a wealth of information and valuable insight at a moment’s notice. Perhaps most importantly, the collected data can be presented in a graphically rich dashboard and is actionable, which means the data can be used to improve processes. Dashboards also give fleet managers the ability to set user-defined goals that allow for benchmarking operations.

GAO: Air Force needs better analysis of new GPS sats

A modenized GPS IIR-M satellite was recently
declared operation by the Air Force after being
lofted into orbit last month. (Lockheed Martin)
As reported by Air Force Times: The Air Force should come up with better cost estimates and options for new GPS Satellites, according to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report.

The GAO was responding to an Air Force study on lower-cost space solutions for GPS. The Air Force identified nine space options ranging from $13 billion to $25 billion between 2013 and 2030, with each option based on 30 satellites instead of the current baseline of 24.

Additionally, the Air Force has recently found a method for lengthening the life of several of the GPS satellites already in orbit.

“More information on key cost drivers and cost estimates, and broader input from stakeholders would help guide future investment decisions,” GAO concluded.

“Specifically, the key cost drivers include dual launch capability (launching two satellites on a single launch vehicle), navigation satellites (smaller GPS-type satellites yet to be developed), and a nuclear detection capability. The cost estimates also excluded the ground control and user equipment segments and cost risk.

“Further, the Air Force did not obtain inputs from some key stakeholders such as those from the GPS positioning, navigation, and timing advisory community.”