As reported by The Verge:After conflicts between protestors and police in Ferguson, Mo. yesterday — particularly in the wake of militarized police officers arresting Washington Post and Huffington Post reporters working in a nearby McDonald's — some have suggested
that on-body cameras should be more widely used among on-duty police.
The theory is that by recording every situation and every conflict that
an officer encounters, law enforcement and citizens have an
unquestionable account of what really happened. It might also stop an
officer from crossing the line.
The Verge produced a story and documentary
last year about Axon Flex, perhaps the most advanced of these on-body
police cameras, and the advantages and disadvantages of the technology.
In that story, civil rights attorney Scott Greenwood
talked about his work to establish concrete rules regarding on-body
police cameras. I asked him to talk a little about how on-body cameras couldn't helped the situation in Ferguson last night.
"The proper use of OBRS is going to be a very important part of how these agencies restore legitimacy and public confidence."
"On-body recording systems
[OBRS] would have been incredibly useful in Ferguson," he says. "This is
yet another controversial incident involving one officer and one
subject, a minority youth who was unarmed," a reference to Michael
Brown, who was killed by police on August 9th. "OBRS would have
definitively captured whatever interaction these two had that preceded
the use of deadly force." Armed with footage from an on-body camera
system, it's possible that police would've had no option but to take
swift action against the officers involved — or if Brown's behavior
wasn't as eyewitnesses describe, perhaps protests wouldn't have swelled
in the first place. Instead, the citizens of Ferguson are left with more
questions than answers.
Moving forward, Greenwood
doesn't see how on-body cameras can be avoided. "I see no way moving
forward in which Ferguson police do not use OBRS," he says. "The proper
use of OBRS is going to be a very important part of how these agencies
restore legitimacy and public confidence."
There need to be rules, of
course — and in his capacity working with the ACLU, Greenwood has helped
to sketch out some of those rules. But when situations like Ferguson
emerge, it seems reasonable to think that more transparency and more
public records are what's needed, not less.
No comments:
Post a Comment