Remo Masina isn't involved in shooting the Olympics, but he's already familiar with drones' finesse for filming winter sports: He uses them to film skiers for commercials. The drones are quieter and cheaper than a manned helicopter (though they can still cost up to $40,000), he told the Associated Press, and they allow the filmmaker to get much closer to his subject.
Drones are also more flexible than cable-suspended camera systems, which are also present at the Winter Olympics. While live transmission is tricky—it requires an extra transmitter, which weighs on the drone—Masina says he's flown such devices at over 40 mph while delivering live, high-definition video.
Masina says that drones are "for sure" the future of sports broadcasting. UK company HeliPOV, which provides drones on which to mount existing cameras, has some great examples of just how cool the resulting video can be:
It won't take long for drones to be fully integrated into broadcasting: One company is already prototyping drones that automatically follow a person from a few feet away—perfect, they say, for downhill skiing. And drones are also making appearances at events smaller than the Olympics.
There are limitations: In many countries, drone regulations are still lagging behind the times, and it might not be clear to a broadcaster that they can be used legally. Then there are concerns about crashes. But with the risks low and potential benefits high, it could be that sports photography will be one of the first uses of drones to go mainstream.
Expect similar kinds of photography drones to be used for near-real-time GIS street level mapping, and for aerial maps typically provided by Earth satellite systems: Drone generated street views for both indoor, and outdoor applications are not far away.
No comments:
Post a Comment